![]() We do not recommend using DLSS at 1080p, but at 1440p and 4K we have not problems recommending it. Yes, some places can look worse, but in general, DLSS looks better, which is fantastic given the performance boost the feature offers at 1440p and 4K. To finish off, Shadow of the Tomb Raider has the best implementation of DLSS that we have seen to date, in many cases offering levels of image detail that are higher than that is provided by a natively rendered image with TAA. Even so, this feature comes at a huge performance cost, which is why we'd guess that a lot of players will steer clear of it, especially at higher resolutions. Even so, the impact this has on uneven terrain on in the many carved walls and statues within the game, is enormous, creating accurate shading with razor sharp shadow casts. While this is a smart move, it results in the function going by unnoticed in some sections of gameplay and prevents the accuracy of sun-cast ray-traced shadows from being seen at all.Īt High and Ultra ray traced shadows settings things become more impressive, with accurate shadows appearing everywhere, resulting in many cases where the game's shadow maps are replaced with something that looks more diffuse and less sharp, which some players might dislike. Moving on to ray tracing, we can see that Nixxes made every effort to make ray traced shadows less demanding, but there is no getting around the fact that adding ray tracing to an already demanding game is just going to cause performance to become worse, even with DLSS taking back some of the lost framerate.Īt Medium settings, Nixxes tried to enhance Shadow of the Tomb Raider with minimal use of Ray Traced Shadows, allowing it only to be used on specific features to minimise its performance impact. Please look at page 2 to see our DLSS on and DLSS off comparisons. This factor always means that DLSS won't fully match a native resolution rendering, as DLSS cannot approximate detail that is not there, that said, DLSS does a fantastic job at 1440p and 4K. At 1080p, it becomes hard to generate more pixel detail, as sub-1080p images are not known for their sharpness. Simply put, DLSS approximates extra detail using lower resolution imagery this is how DLSS offers increased performance levels. ![]() When factoring in the higher framerates that DLSS often provides, the feature is more than worth turning on at high resolutions.Īt 1080p, the difference between DLSS on and DLSS off becomes more noticeable, with Lara's hair and some other elements growing more blurred when the feature is enabled. Yes, some areas of the image do look worse than a native rendering, but more often then not our screenshots look the same under DLSS or a little crisper. Shadow of the Tomb Raider offers the best implementation of DLSS that we have seen to date, living up to the hype surrounding the feature by creating a final image that, in many cases, looks better than the game running at a native 1440p or 4K. As we said before, under the game's highest preset even the mighty RTX 2080 Ti can't keep the game above 60FPS, a factor that makes any performance boost worth grabbing. Let's start off with DLSS, a feature that in our eyes is way more interesting that Nixxes' raytraced shadows. Using the game's Highest Preset, the game already dipped below 60FPS at 4K on an RTX 2080 Ti, something which will no doubt leave a lot of PC gamers confused as to why the game needed to become even more challenging to run. Shadow of the Tomb Raider was a demanding PC game before ray traced shadows were added into the mix. If you have read the last few pages, you should already know our thoughts on Shadow of the Tomb Raider's use of RTX, but you've come here for the conclusion, so here goes. ![]() ![]() Soo, to DLSS or not to DLSS? Should I ray trace my Shadows of the Tomb Raider? RTX is here, and with it comes a lot of decisions to make. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |